Argumentative Discourse in L2 German: A Sociocognitive Perspective on the Development of Facework Strategies
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study contributes to the growing field of research on interlanguage pragmatic development with a study on the development of argumentative discourse ability by second language learners of German. I will be focusing on facework, that is, the use of verbal strategies that allow the speaker to have his or her social identities, particular personal qualities, and attributes validated by others. The study approaches the data, which were gathered from learners of German at 3 levels of proficiency, from the perspective of sequential and preference organisation. The analysis shows that argumentative sequences develop from a simple 2or 3-turn structure, which consists of merely 1 “core” adjacency pair (assessment/opinion–agreement/disagreement), to being extended by post-sequences and insertion sequences. It is only for learners of higher proficiency, however, that these extensions serve to further the argument rather than merely building on agreement. When disagreeing, learners increasingly use agreement turns to sharpen forthcoming disagreement or use their interlocutors’ turns to serve that purpose. These developments are then explained from a sociocognitive perspective. I will argue that developments are due to learners overcoming processing constraints as proficiency progresses, as well as their changing frames of reference for the task.
منابع مشابه
Face and self-presentation in spoken L2 discourse: Renewing the research agenda in interlanguage pragmatics
This paper introduces a more nuanced view of face and facework than the commonly used frameworks in interlanguage pragmatics. It argues that ILP not only prioritizes research on the expression of politeness in the L2 and the acquisition of politeness strategies, but that the field also does that in an extremely decontextualized manner that takes little account of the situatedness of linguistic ...
متن کاملAppraising Iranian L2 Classroom Discourse Contents From the Critical Pedagogy Perspective
Critical pedagogy (CP) empowers L2 learners to have a voice in the classroom and in the society. This study was an attempt to investigate whether the current classroom discourse in Iran can endow the L2 learners with a critical awareness to actively transform their learning processes and creatively engage in collaborative dialogues to construct new knowledge. To this end, the discou...
متن کاملThe Effects of Planned Instruction on Iranian L2 Learners' Interlanguage Pragmatic Development
L2 research has shown that instruction in L2 pragmatics is necessary. The current study evaluated the impact of explicit instruction on EFL learner's awareness and production of three speech acts of request, apology, and complaint. It also probed whether learners’ language proficiency plays any role in incorporating pragmatic instruction into the L2 classroom. Iranian undergraduate students maj...
متن کاملCommunication Strategies Revisited: Looking beyond Interactional and Psycholinguistic Perspectives
Second language (L2) communication strategies (CSs) have traditionally been dealt with through either interactional or psychological perspectives. However, this paper is a critical attempt to question the status of the particular kinds of psycholinguistic and interactional approaches that currently dominate the field of second language acquisition (SLA). In this way, it expands the significance...
متن کاملDiscourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse
Based on a contrastive approach that compares the argumentative genre of editorial with the narrative genre of personal narrative across two production modes, single-authored data and data elicited in an editing-based task, this paper examines the impact of genre on the realizations of discourse relations, paying particular attention to the argumentative genre and its preferential realizations ...
متن کامل